🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.